pan pan pan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Milan Zamazal wrote:
> I'm a DD interested in CL. I maintain (although not very actively) a
> few Debian CL packages and I'm not going to give up on them, so I need
> at least common-lisp-controller (in addition to CL implementations) in
You're right of course. We'll keep clc and 'native' libraries. But the
others should go.
I also think that slime should go. Not that I don't think it is good
package that has its use, but because it is just so tricky to maintain
and I never have understood how to debug those emacs bugs :-(.
And I'm not stopping outright, it is just that I'm not doing enough for
all those packages, so I'll cut them right back.
Ah and darcs is gone for me a long time ago, all my packages are or
should be in git.
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
"God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----