[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The repository 'http://deb.debian.org/debian buster Release' does not have a Release file.



On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 12:23:03PM -0700, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 at 11:04, Domenico Andreoli <cavok@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 09:10:53AM -0700, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 at 08:45, Domenico Andreoli <cavok@debian.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:50:31PM +0200, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> > > > > debian/eol:* is where the stable but EOL'd images are built / live
> > > >
> > > > When a similar thing happened with Fedora, the images got updated so
> > > > to point to the RPM archives location.
> > > >
> > > > I can also post a PR/MR/patch but don't know where.
> > > >
> > >
> > > We've thought about doing so in the images, but made the very intentional
> > > choice not to so that users can in turn make a similarly explicit choice
> > to
> > > stay on EOL base images (instead of accidentally doing so).  In Docker in
> > > particular, this works well because the "switching cost" from the
> > debian:*
> > > images to the debian/eol:* images is typically very low (changing a line
> > in
> > > a Dockerfile).
> >
> > I tried with that but I got this error:
> >
> > Pulling docker image debian/eol:10 ...
> > WARNING: Failed to pull image with policy "always": Error response from
> > daemon: manifest for debian/eol:10 not found: manifest unknown: manifest
> > unknown (manager.go:238:0s)
> >
> > Did I do it wrong?
> >
> 
> Yeah, try "debian/eol:buster" (see https://oci.dag.dev/?repo=debian/eol for
> available tags)

Yes, that worked. Thanks!

Dom

-- 
rsa4096: 3B10 0CA1 8674 ACBA B4FE  FCD2 CE5B CF17 9960 DE13
ed25519: FFB4 0CC3 7F2E 091D F7DA  356E CC79 2832 ED38 CB05

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: