Bug#696596: Marketplace EULA: replace the social contract by another text.
- To: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>, 696596@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#696596: Marketplace EULA: replace the social contract by another text.
- From: Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 12:25:29 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] ZyUA-U5cBdC6nLlw@doom.morgul.net>
- Reply-to: Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>, 696596@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20121223171906.GH16457@falafel.plessy.net>
- References: <954389460CF07742B59C1C17DDF1639A06C720@ex10-mbx-7001.ant.amazon.com> <1355904114.28610.43.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <20121223111013.GD1676@bach.rivera.co.za> <20121223171906.GH16457@falafel.plessy.net> <20121223171906.GH16457@falafel.plessy.net>
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:19:06AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > If we absolutely have to have a EULA then something akin to the default
> > > MOTD would seem more appropriate, i.e.:
> > >
> > > The programs included with the Debian GNU/Linux system are free software;
> > > the exact distribution terms for each program are described in the
> > > individual files in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright.
> > >
> > > Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent
> > > permitted by applicable law.
> >
> > Agreed. We don't expect our users to agree to anything in the Social
> > Contract.
>
> I agree that it more direct and accurate to point users at
> /usr/share/doc/*/copyright. This said, having a link to our definition of Free
> software would be useful to users who are not familar with Debian.
>
> How about:
>
> The programs included with the Debian GNU/Linux system are free software
> as defined in <http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines>; the exact
> distribution terms for each program are described in the individual files
> in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright.
>
> Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent
> permitted by applicable law.
>
> I am filing this as a bug in the BTS to track the issue, with severity 'normal'
> because my gut feeling is that it is indeed confusing to display the DFSG as
> EULA, while the DFSG does not ask the user to agree to anything. Thanks to
> James for the initial clarification by the way.
I've asked the www team to host the proposed text on www.debian.org.
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1086579
If they can't/won't do that, we can consider hosting it on
cloud.debian.org.
noah
Reply to: