On 2022-08-09 20:56:23 +0200 (+0200), Michael Kesper wrote: > Wouldn't it be much better to provide these checksums than to > change the documentation? Changing the text can (thankfully now) happen fairly quickly. Adding signing infrastructure to the Salsa CI pipeline for image building is presumably a lot more work involving sensitive things like key management. But since you're the one volunteering to do it... ;) Also note that the checksums aren't missing, those are already available. It's just signatures of the checksums lists which are not yet. -- Jeremy Stanley
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature