On 2022-06-01 22:19:59, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 09:17:32AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Agreed. Ross, can you reconsider? Johnathan, your thoughts? > > Sure - if we adopt a policy that permits it (and so far it sounds like we > will), I'd be happy to continue. First of all, Ross thanks for all the work you do and how you're doing it. Second I'm supporting the idea that people working for cloud providers shouldn't be excluded from being DPL delegates. To be fair we can't afford to not do it that way. I just hope that we can struck a balance where we have delegated people working for cloud providers (various) alongside somebody who is not employed by any of them. -- |_|0|_| | |_|_|0| "Panta rei" | |0|0|0| -------- kuLa -------- | gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature