On 2020-04-22 16:35:25, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 07:57:19PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > > Product title: For older releases, the title is listed as (e.g.) "Debian > > GNU/Linux 9 (Stretch)". For buster, it is "Debian 10 Buster". I prefer > > the formating used for stretch, and would like to update buster to > > match. > > What do you mean with "formating"? "GNU/Linux" is now irrelevant. But IMO a nice gesture to non Linux parts of our community and costs us nothing. > "Debian Linux", maybe, but redundant. It is possible but why not to indicate that also there is something else than Linux in Debian. > > I'm open to the idea of listing only the version number, and > > dropping the code name, but don't feel strongly either way. Opinions? > > Well. People search for both? > > > Is there existing text that > > would work better here? > > Sadly, no. > > I looked at other distributions on Azure and found for example: > https://azuremarketplace.microsoft.com/en-us/marketplace/apps/canonical.ubuntuserver > > > Buster is only "The universal operating system." I > > think pulling some snippets in from the release notes makes sense for > > buster. Agree? > > Should this be highlights of the release? Hightlights of the software? > I don't know. If we're going with version and/or code name in the information text then I suppose giving a bit of information about release it self IMO would make sense. -- |_|0|_| | |_|_|0| "Panta rei" | |0|0|0| -------- kuLa -------- | gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature