[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#785457: marked as done (cloud.debian.org: AMI don't need getty)

Your message dated Tue, 15 Oct 2019 23:56:43 +0200
with message-id <23974.16539.617817.34798@informatik.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #785457,
regarding cloud.debian.org: AMI don't need getty
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
785457: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785457
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: cloud.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: cloud.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: image
Usertags: aws

Hi,
While fine-tuning the Debian 8.0.0 HVM AMI, I noticed that getty processes fill up space in the otherwise short default process list, so I disabled these with: 

systemctl mask getty@tty{1,2,3,4,5,6}.service
systemctl mask serial-getty@{hvc0,ttyS0}.service
systemctl mask getty-static.service
I don't see any reason for having getty support in AMI. I think these should be disabled. 

All the best,
Ognyan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Using the new tools, this does no apply any more.
-- 
regards Thomas

--- End Message ---
Reply to: