On 2019-09-02 07:58:47, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 04:33:55PM +0000, Jeremy Stanley a écrit : > > On 2019-09-01 14:17:21 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Kulisz wrote: > > > I'm looking into our tooling in regards of python2 removal and > > > noticed that https://github.com/eucalyptus/ looks basically dead > > > > The https://eucalyptus.cloud/ Web site now refers to source code > > residing in the https://github.com/Corymbia organization, which seems > > to have much more recent activity. > > > > > Are here any people who can claim to the contrary specifically in > > > regards to py3 support in euca2ools etc? > > > > Unfortunately, even though there's been some activity on the Corymbia > > fork of euca2ools, skimming the commit history and sources it looks > > like no work has been done on Py3K support. Worth trying just to be > > sure, but I would not get my hopes up. > > Hello everybody, > > on my side I would have no objections with a removal. Should we actively ask for removal or wait till normal bugs will become RC and removal for all py2 packages is going to be compulsory? I personally am ok with both. -- |_|0|_| | |_|_|0| "Panta rei" | |0|0|0| -------- kuLa -------- | gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature