[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#865611: non-free repositories are enabled by default



Package: cloud-init
Version: 0.7.9-2
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi!

By default, cloud-init enables the non-free repositories. It
shouldn't. I even wonder if this should not be fixed in
stable/oldstable too.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental-debug'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages cloud-init depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.61
ii  gdisk                  1.0.1-1
ii  ifupdown               0.8.19
ii  init-system-helpers    1.48
ii  lsb-base               9.20161125
ii  lsb-release            9.20161125
ii  net-tools              1.60+git20161116.90da8a0-1
ii  procps                 2:3.3.12-3
ii  python3                3.5.3-1
pn  python3-configobj      <none>
ii  python3-jinja2         2.9.6-1
pn  python3-jsonpatch      <none>
pn  python3-oauthlib       <none>
pn  python3-prettytable    <none>
ii  python3-requests       2.12.4-1
ii  python3-six            1.10.0-4
ii  python3-yaml           3.12-1

cloud-init recommends no packages.

cloud-init suggests no packages.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=qG8n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: