Re: [vagrant] issues with jessie64
Andreas wrote:
>
>On sön, 2016-04-24 at 09:51 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
>> Any thoughts on Standard vs Important on this list ?
>
>For the purpose of developing Ansible/Puppet/etc manifests I believe
>that it's a good thing if the Vagrant imagine contains a smaller set
>of pre-installed packages. That way ones manifests need to be more
>explicit in specifying needed packages, and those manifests are then
>more likely to work right away with whatever base image ones VPS/cloud-
>provider happen to provide.
AFAICS, most users are going to expect more minimal images like that,
but maybe not all? Is there sufficient value / expected use that we
should produce variant images with larger package selections?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
"Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out
whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast."
Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html
Reply to: