On 2015-06-02 20:14:19, Chris Fordham wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Martey Dodoo <bugs.debian.org@marteydodoo.com> > wrote: > Personally, I think that if third-party software like Chef or Puppet are > installed in the base box (with all of their dependencies), it also makes > sense to install aptitude so that upgrading packages with Ansible works > properly. I see no sense in installing aptitude to upgrade packages when apt-get is already there. I just had a quick look into ansible apt module and have to say it's a bit messy. It's utilising apt-get for dist-upgrade and aptitude for full-upgrade. Probably this should be pointed out to ansible devs as suboptimal solution. > Thats unfortunate, we need to fix this and make them provisionerless and get > rid of the 'enhancement' approach. Vagrant plugins and inline provisioning > is the right way to do it (as demonstrated by Chef Software Inc.). I agree. -- |_|0|_| | |_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" | |0|0|0| -------- kuLa --------- | gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature