Dnia 2014-12-26, pią o godzinie 10:09 +0100, Anders Ingemann pisze: > On 26 December 2014 at 06:57, James Bromberger <james@rcpt.to> wrote: [ cut ] > Nicely done! Thank you James. I think the SSL transport is a welcome > and uncontroversial addition to the base images. > On a side: Something is afoot in bootstrap-vz, I have recently pushed > an integration testing branch, which right now successfully tests > virtualbox wheezy images (oldstable and unstable are failing atm) - > it's been a long time coming and it's far from done, but I'd love to > hear if anybody'd have some feedback. > Wow! Good job! I've skimmed through all the commits and like the idea. It'd take longer time and some experiments to grasp it (the change is HUGE!) but it seems well thought. Some initial thoughts: Do I understand correctly, that now we can either run bootstrap-vz locally, or run server and then connect to it and use it to create as many images as we want to? I like the idea of capabilities of the servers. Partial manifests and merging them will be useful not only for test, but also for building regular images - e.g. for automatic building EC2 images for China region. That's all for now, I'll write when I have more remarks. Best regards. -- Tomasz Rybak GPG/PGP key ID: 2AD5 9860 Fingerprint A481 824E 7DD3 9C0E C40A 488E C654 FB33 2AD5 9860 http://member.acm.org/~tomaszrybak
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part