Dnia 2014-03-25, wto o godzinie 11:50 -0700, Clint Byrum pisze: > Excerpts from Tomasz Rybak's message of 2014-03-25 11:41:08 -0700: > > Dnia 2014-03-25, wto o godzinie 19:21 +0100, Juerg Haefliger pisze: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Juerg Haefliger <juergh@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thomas, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Just a quick message to tell everyone I have just uploaded new > > > images to > > > > > the HP cloud. > > > > > > > > Are there any plans to provide a Debian cloud images repository for > > > people to download the images from? Like cloud-images.ubuntu.com? > > > > > > Yes? No? Maybe? > > > > I'm not against this idea, but what would be the reason for that? > > There are these crazy people out there who want to own their own > infrastructure and run a cloud on top of it. See: www.openstack.org > > > I'm not sure whether it is possible to use e.g. AMI outside of > > AWS EC2; and we have links to current images in Debian Wiki. > > Maybe it would be nice idea to have more visible > > debian-cloud.debian.org with links to official (or at least > > blessed) images in appropriate clouds (GCE, AWS, Azure?) > > but I am not entirely sure that hostin images > > (which would require for the user to download them and then > > upload to the cloud) would be the best idea. > > > > AMI's can be used on Eucalyptus or OpenStack. Maybe CloudStack too. > Sorry - I did not want for my question sound like it's stupid suggestion. Besides - I completely forgot about Eucalyptus; thanks for reminding about its existence. The need for hosting of AMIs on Debian infrastructure makes more sense now. Best regards. -- Tomasz Rybak GPG/PGP key ID: 2AD5 9860 Fingerprint A481 824E 7DD3 9C0E C40A 488E C654 FB33 2AD5 9860 http://member.acm.org/~tomaszrybak
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part