[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Aw: Re: Adding cloud-init in the next Wheezy point release



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:56 AM
Subject: Wheezy point release planning
To: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-cd@lists.debian.org, ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org,
press@debian.org, debian-live@lists.debian.org


Hi,

Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of 15/16
June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point release. Would
that work for everyone?

Regards,

Adam

On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Anders Ingemann <anders@ingemann.de> wrote:
> On 12 May 2013 13:49, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 05:15:52PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
>> > Currently even the EC2 part of Amazon's build script pulls a specific
>> > version of euca2ools from Eucalyptus's github site during the build
>> > process. It also pulls a boto patch from Red Hat's bugzilla and applies it.
>> > While none of this bothers me from a freeness perspective, it doesn't meet
>> > Lucas's criterion (A) (about all software coming from Debian).
>>
>> As I understood it, that point is about the software that's contained in
>> the images. Am I wrong in assuming that euca2ools is only used to build
>> the images and not shipped as part of it? I've only grepped around
>> Anders' script very quickly, and that seems to actually be the case, but
>> I certainly might have missed something.
>>
>> I think this is an important distinction to make, if only to avoid
>> double standards wrt the regular Debian building toolchain.
>>
>> Cheers.
>> --
>> Stefano Zacchiroli  . . . . . . .  zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o
>> Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
>> Former Debian Project Leader  . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o .
>> « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
>
>
> Forgot to press "Reply all"
>
>> Am I wrong in assuming that euca2ools is only used to build the images and not shipped as part of it?
> Nope, that is correct, we need neither euca2ools nor boto for the image.
> Short of using non-free tools I'd say that on the building machine in
> general anything goes (as long as the one who is bootstrapping is made
> aware of the changes to his system).
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cloud-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] CAMcOGXEv+WZ0+EJ37w65ppwTPm7jwnE5y_UKGNtnUTUASNM0Kw@mail.gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] CAMcOGXEv+WZ0+EJ37w65ppwTPm7jwnE5y_UKGNtnUTUASNM0Kw@mail.gmail.com
>



--
Jose R R
http://www.metztli-it.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Lotus Symphony supported on GNU/Linux, Mac OS, and Windows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daylight Saving Time in USA & Canada ends: Sunday, November 03 2013
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Reply to: