On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:26:06PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I think that with the recent opening of wheezy-backports and > squeeze-backports-sloppy, there is definitely an interesting move to consider. I'm glad to read that! > Can we discuss on a timeline ? Would people be comfortable with a one-month > period to test the possibility to prepare stable or testing images with recent > cloud-init and euca2ools, resolve potential disagreements (I want psmisc for > /usr/bin/killall, please :), and prepare actual images to distribute ? I think that would be totally fine. It might make us step into post-Wheezy release, but I don't think that's a blocker. After all, very little people know we do have cloud images and I doubt that knowing that *before* the Wheezy release would make a difference. It might mean that we miss the chance to document this in the release notes, though. Additionally, a timeline is fine, but unless we have volunteers that are actively working on the topics you suggest, I fear that might delay the announcement indefinitely. > (By the way, I agree that the second draft sent by Stefano solves the > problem that was caused by the recommendation to run private clouds in > the initial proposal). Thanks. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature