[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1006472: Upload to unstable?



Hey everyone - chipping in as I have been kind of lame in helping with this process.

I'll spin up a Debian VM and get testing, though I don't think any of the issues are critical. The packages should be safe to enter unstable IMO as already lots of point revisions has been made upstream. Also, cinnamon is broken in Ubuntu Kinetic at the moment 😋

When that is all said and done, I'll get to updating xapp to 2.2.14, nemo-fileroller and nemo-python to 5.4.1.

-Josh



From: Roland Clobus
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 1:57 PM
To: fantonifabio@tiscali.it; 1006472@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#1006472: Upload to unstable?

Hello Fabio,

On 24/07/2022 23:00, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> Il 24/07/2022 22:12, Roland Clobus ha scritto:
>> would you consider to upload this fix to unstable? It is currently
>> only in experimental.
...
> I think however that within a few weeks with the next bugfixes they will
> be good enough to be able to migrate them to unstable.
>
> Is it a problem to wait up to a few more weeks or I should upload this
> change to unstable faster?

No need to hurry. I now know that you are planning to bring the fix to
unstable in a few weeks, when the issues are fixed.

I'm working together with Phil Hands on https://openqa.debian.net which
contains automated testing. At the moment a Cinnamon image is not (yet)
tested, but it could be possible to have a Cinnamon image with the
packages from experimental (using apt-pinning) and some tests.
See e.g. the start-stop test for the GNOME apps:
https://openqa.debian.net/tests/65161
or the general tests of the live image:
https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distri=debian&version=sid&build=20220711T170000Z_sid&groupid=14

With kind regards,
Roland Clobus

Reply to: