[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Testing migration with pending autopkgtest



On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:03:55PM -0500, Peter Colberg wrote:
> For a package in unstable that has reached an age of 5 days and
> otherwise satisfies migration requirements, does a single pending
> autopkgtest block migration or add a penalty to the age [1, 2]?
> 
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/DebianSetup
> [2] https://release.debian.org/doc/britney/solutions-to-common-policy-issues.html#britney-complains-about-autopkgtest

Apologies, I missed earlier that this question may be answered by
sampling other packages at the top of the s390x autopkgtest queue.

For instance, cacti [6] 1.2.23+ds1-2 was accepted on 2023-01-19 and
migrated to testing on 2023-01-21, but has not passed autopkgtest on
ppc64el and s390x to date. There are two pending, migration-reference
jobs for these archs [7], submitted on 2023-02-01 and 2023-02-07.

[6] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cacti
[7] https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/cacti/

It appears that pending autopkgtest do not delay migration to testing.

Regards,
Peter


Reply to: