El 12/04/22 a las 20:42, Paul Gevers escribió: > On 12-04-2022 17:40, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > > > > Could you run rather `lxc-ls -f` (to include IP addresses information) > > > > > > > > root@unmatched:~# lxc-ls -f > > > > NAME STATE AUTOSTART GROUPS IPV4 IPV6 > > > > UNPRIVILEGED > > > > autopkgtest-unstable-riscv64 STOPPED 0 - - - false > > > > The container wasn't running. > > Hmm, rather stupid of me. > Please, don't say that! > root@unmatched:~# lxc-start -n autopkgtest-unstable-riscv64 > root@unmatched:~# lxc-ls -f > NAME STATE AUTOSTART GROUPS IPV4 IPV6 UNPRIVILEGED > autopkgtest-unstable-riscv64 RUNNING 0 - - - false > > > > > root@unmatched:~# grep net /var/lib/lxc/autopkgtest-unstable-riscv64/config > > > > lxc.net.0.type = veth > > > > lxc.net.0.link = lxcbr0 > > > > lxc.net.0.flags = up > > > > lxc.net.0.hwaddr = 00:16:3e:00:00:00 This is the same mac address than the unmatched's lxcbr0. Try changing it. ... > > * Just to be sure, could you verify the lxc bridge in the host machine is > > called lxcbr0? > > root@unmatched:~# ifconfig lxcbr0 > lxcbr0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 10.0.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.3.255 > inet6 fe80::216:3eff:fe00:0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > ether 00:16:3e:00:00:00 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 16 bytes 3828 (3.7 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 58 bytes 6160 (6.0 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 ... HTH, -- Santiago
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature