where to maintain DEP8^W autopkgtest spec now
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:38:38PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Here's my review of the proposed policy patch:
FWIW, I'm leaving these comments on the substance of the policy to the
autopkgtest folks. Martin, Antonio, et al.: can you please comment?
Regarding the requested format changes (lintian cleanness, markup,
etc.), I'm struggling to find time to implement them, but they're on my
TODO list. I'll keep you posted.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack at upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o
Ma?tre de conf?rences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o .
? the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/autopkgtest-devel/attachments/20141024/7d783521/attachment.sig>
Reply to: