[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: User support for the debian-chinese-*



Great! I agree.

在08-4-30,Zu <zzh@rashost.com> 写道:
I prefer merging and I agree that "traditional and simplified Chinese are all Chinese".


--
Email/Gtalk/MSN/QQ: zzh@rashost.com
瑞豪开源VPS - 基于Linux/Xen
http://www.RasHost.com

2008/4/30 Kanru Chen <koster@debian.org.tw>:

Hi Andrew,

I think we should respect the opinions from who are actually using the
lists, so I forward this mail to the lists.

2008/4/30 Andrew Lee <andrew@linux.org.tw>:
> Dear folks,
>
>  Foka went on IRC and ask for merge debian-chinese-big5 and
>  debian-chinese-gb into one mailing list. Please check the log for
>  details or read these(I copied from my log) below:
>
>  01:56 < foka> 我最近有?想法:如果把 debian-chinese-big5 和
>  debian-chinese-gb
>               二合?一,大家看法如何? :-)
>  01:57 < aguai> foka: 不懂?
>  01:57 < paulliu> 唔...?啥要做?件事??..:P
>  01:57 < paulliu> aguai, 那是?? mailing list
>  01:58 < foka> paulliu, 是??的:?在都是 UTF-8 年代了,也不再存在以前
>               Big5、GB2312 ?件??的??了。
>  01:58 < paulliu> 嗯, 的?...不?我是??想的...其?那? big5 的意思??是
>                  chinese-traditional
>  01:59 < paulliu> ?然大家都是中?人...不?繁?跟??..?是?有一些??上
>  的困?..
>  02:01 < paulliu> 不?, debian-chinese-big5 ?有甚? traffic 就是了..
>  02:01 < paulliu> ?然?只是我的看法而已啦..
>  02:01 < paulliu> 我是?得, 繁?中文跟??中文, 有?是?分?的...
>  02:02 < foka> 其?整????好;我??好多台??的朋友,很快熟???字
>  了。大?朋友看繁?字,倒也不是??,只是?不出?而已。
>  02:02 < paulliu> 是可以看的懂, 但是我自己的??是...偶?要猜...
>  02:03 < foka> paulliu, 呵呵,正好互相??。 :-)
>  02:03 < paulliu> 也???中文猜中意思的?率是 9x%, 日文?字 4x%......
>
>  Debian do have lists for different languages. I think it's easier for
>  support our users. Cause they can use their mother language to ask
>  question and got answer by the mother language. We have separately lists
>  because long time ago, we have encoding difference problem on big5 and
>  gb2312, so that we have two lists for Chinese.
>
>  But my opinion now Debian is a global community, it is not specfic for
>  any nation or racism. Who use traditional or simplified Chinese are
>  equal participant.
>
>  But everyone can has opinion. Paulliu said that traditional and
>  simplified Chinese are all Chinese, which I agreed. And Paulliu also
>  think traditional and simplified Chinese should be separate.
>
>  However the point I concerned is our users support and free software
>  community.
>
>  So I'd like to ask, what's you guys' opinion:
>  Does our community only limited in Taiwan or China?
>  Do you guys agree people from over the world can be also part of Debian
>  community?
>  You guys prefer to do the user support together or separately, and why?
>
>  Please give your valuable opinion.
>
>  Kindest regards,
>
>  -Andrew
>



--
 ~ Kanru Chen <koster@debian.org.tw>
 'v' http://stu.csie.ncnu.edu.tw/~kanru.96/
 // \\ GnuPG-Key ID: 365CC7A2
 /( )\ Fingerprint: 3278 DFB4 BB28 6E8C 9E1F 1ECB B1B7 5B5F 365C C7A2
 ^`~'^





--
以Wiki模式创建Linux中文文档,欢迎加入
http://www.linux-wiki.cn/
Reply to: