Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Li Daobing [Sun, 22 May 2005 15:11:06 +0800]: > > Hi! > > >>>The official maintainer is Anthony Fok <foka@debian.org>, but he did not >>>work since Wed, 16 Apr 2003. > > > If you'd like to adopt the package instead of NMUing, that'd be great, > since the package will receive more attention. I've asked Jeroen van > Wolffelaar, currently in charge of the MIA process, and he says > there'd be no problem with you adopting qterm. > > >>Another question about qterm: >>If I want to modify the source tarball, for example, I want to delete >>the admin/CVS and debian/*.ex in the source, should I modify the version >>number, for example, called it 0.4.0pre2.dfsg.1-1 or some other name? > > > As you're repacking the tarball, the -1 bit wouldn't be included in > the tarball name itself. As for the .dfsg bit, that's normally used > when the tarball was modified to removed files that failed to meet the > DFSG. > > If it's really necessary that you remove those files (which doesn't > really seem the case to me, so perhaps it's better to keep the > pristine upstream tarball), you could use 0.4.0pre2a, or > 0.4.0pre2.ds.1 (ds is commonly used to, and it stands, I believe, for > "debian source"). > > HTH, > 某位老大说我可以adopt qterm，但是谁能教教我如何adopt, Thanks. -- Best regards, Li Daobing
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature