Re: RFC: Shall we make debian-chinese-* a subscribers-only list?

To: Anthony Fok <anthony@thizlinux.com>
Cc: debian-chinese-gb@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Shall we make debian-chinese-* a subscribers-only list?
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@dman.ddts.net>
Date: 18 Sep 2002 21:04:49 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87sn07sb2m.fsf@jidanni.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020917175311.GB27734@anthony.homelinux.net>
References: <[🔎] 20020917175311.GB27734@anthony.homelinux.net>

Go ahead.  I can still post thru gmane.org!
Us little modem users with tiny POP boxes would die without NNTP.
-- 
http://jidanni.org/ Taiwan(04)25854780 积丹尼

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-chinese-big5-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

-- 
| This message was re-posted from debian-chinese-big5@lists.debian.org
| and converted from big5 to gb2312 by an automatic gateway.

Reply to:

References:
- RFC: Shall we make debian-chinese-* a subscribers-only list?
  - From: Anthony Fok <anthony@thizlinux.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#160282: cal: Should use the latter Chinese char for day of the week (fwd)
Next by Date: bg5ps for html?
Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Shall we make debian-chinese-* a subscribers-only list?
Next by thread: Re: RFC: Shall we make debian-chinese-* a subscribers-only list?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread