[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted haproxy 2.2.9-2+deb11u2 (source) into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 10:48:54 +0200
Source: haproxy
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.9-2+deb11u2
Distribution: bullseye-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian HAProxy Maintainers <team+haproxy@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org>
Closes: 993303
Changes:
 haproxy (2.2.9-2+deb11u2) bullseye-security; urgency=high
 .
   * d/patches: fix missing header name length check in HTX (CVE-2021-40346).
   * d/patches: h2: match absolute-path not path-absolute for :path.
     Closes: #993303.
Checksums-Sha1:
 f75da2c3c2f4b4d01aa6d726696b29bc585ac436 2340 haproxy_2.2.9-2+deb11u2.dsc
 20bcd6b373db215c8d2906f809ed995d154ae846 2900486 haproxy_2.2.9.orig.tar.gz
 be438ab17ea7ec8a41346b3694e118b7393b0d81 79212 haproxy_2.2.9-2+deb11u2.debian.tar.xz
 0eacfe3b140cc43e31ca084ef860d3eacdae9381 8438 haproxy_2.2.9-2+deb11u2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9691deafe8b290045bf9101709b833b985ff43517cd309fdb530977654de818b 2340 haproxy_2.2.9-2+deb11u2.dsc
 21680459b08b9ba21c8cc9f5dbd0ee6e1842f57a3a67f87179871e1c13ebd4e3 2900486 haproxy_2.2.9.orig.tar.gz
 41c8464df8d0e902325ebd069e1759e4ea26aff06b7e61beeb77eb661169282f 79212 haproxy_2.2.9-2+deb11u2.debian.tar.xz
 fbd7dee3fe1d39cde5b034a49117ca3074ff3c596afbe986221cd43b38142867 8438 haproxy_2.2.9-2+deb11u2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 e20cbaf695f3a3c93f3e346229adfa83 2340 net optional haproxy_2.2.9-2+deb11u2.dsc
 b7c89eee17a58be6afaf3af28970d47b 2900486 net optional haproxy_2.2.9.orig.tar.gz
 3007182c6072aaa354567962408e75a8 79212 net optional haproxy_2.2.9-2+deb11u2.debian.tar.xz
 a8200871ff709e2f4dec5678dc840168 8438 net optional haproxy_2.2.9-2+deb11u2_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5hUF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: