Accepted fonts-noto-cjk 1:20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1 (source) into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 13:10:08 -0500
Source: fonts-noto-cjk
Architecture: source
Version: 1:20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1
Distribution: buster
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Fonts Team <debian-fonts@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
Closes: 907999
Changes:
fonts-noto-cjk (1:20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload.
* debian/70-fonts-noto-cjk.conf: Use "prepend" instead of
"prepend_first". This fixes over-aggressive font selection
of Noto CJK fonts in modern web browsers under Chinese locale.
(Closes: #907999)
Checksums-Sha1:
72f1ae3d000b7926573fa51962c4164307fee5b9 2160 fonts-noto-cjk_20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1.dsc
0a4a1362e42de697ed15f5b1a6a1a5fbabe3ca71 5348 fonts-noto-cjk_20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1.debian.tar.xz
02e0b13a144b428beb5dbc2e90869da03dc97e5d 5917 fonts-noto-cjk_20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
d2c51508c61f9b2822198ecf11cfddfdb180b3445fa5740db8ad0a8bb34431df 2160 fonts-noto-cjk_20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1.dsc
71f59fee6db7e97c4967a6d828729ebd051ead0274f73adfe27d3247974c2247 5348 fonts-noto-cjk_20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1.debian.tar.xz
fd76058b4f0cb041b4de6dbc8e63139237c6f3c1bc5b5aa8936848f320ab8c3c 5917 fonts-noto-cjk_20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
d6c0404952e6319bd9b47df31b3a777a 2160 fonts optional fonts-noto-cjk_20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1.dsc
b6ffcbe1de83cb8d3b7ca187940df741 5348 fonts optional fonts-noto-cjk_20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1.debian.tar.xz
6dbebef4b5e06dcb9962fd589150d989 5917 fonts optional fonts-noto-cjk_20170601+repack1-3+deb10u1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=nQmS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: