[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gajim 0.16-1+deb8u1 (source all) into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:33:56 +0100
Source: gajim
Binary: gajim
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.16-1+deb8u1
Distribution: jessie-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Tanguy Ortolo <tanguy+debian@ortolo.eu>
Changed-By: Tanguy Ortolo <tanguy+debian@ortolo.eu>
Description:
 gajim      - GTK+-based Jabber client
Changes:
 gajim (0.16-1+deb8u1) jessie-security; urgency=high
 .
   * debian/patches/fix-cve-2015-8688.patch: backport a fix for CVE-2015-8688.
Checksums-Sha1:
 8e33a2a29e5485a832f397836628af3ca0b8aca9 1884 gajim_0.16-1+deb8u1.dsc
 e6dac18a331dc2615ee63ce445ff8d5f21e41ba8 6122592 gajim_0.16.orig.tar.gz
 502b49eb0ded2e965b60375bd371da07cda11c8c 8928 gajim_0.16-1+deb8u1.debian.tar.xz
 f2c0039f870c33f1728cdeb018b8fffaef4a3c80 3024896 gajim_0.16-1+deb8u1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 5b5c6dd50a5f78e8107cf804b61c36a25f77c916a16964c7a95fc48d7362635e 1884 gajim_0.16-1+deb8u1.dsc
 01775e02044358292835296efa7d59f0ad39974946f872e71b4f040492d3fb64 6122592 gajim_0.16.orig.tar.gz
 fd34fc591f96fa84c11dd69ddd16bb83a5f9935421d8bf0c86486cdd8d0915c5 8928 gajim_0.16-1+deb8u1.debian.tar.xz
 6816f437b9ae599c1d76b28a03b47dbffea4c3f6d5ca46006c57711bdac2b794 3024896 gajim_0.16-1+deb8u1_all.deb
Files:
 7d0c314dc246487de6b3833fee63a1ea 1884 net optional gajim_0.16-1+deb8u1.dsc
 569aeee2851eea03ceab4d4ff54c859b 6122592 net optional gajim_0.16.orig.tar.gz
 560e4d77d2133cbafd141ffdbf0251a7 8928 net optional gajim_0.16-1+deb8u1.debian.tar.xz
 5cebdd61931ac700cf759061a7cda9f8 3024896 net optional gajim_0.16-1+deb8u1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=QrZJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: