Accepted dietlibc 0.12-2.2 (sparc source all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 21:10:10 +0200
Source: dietlibc
Binary: dietlibc-dev dietlibc-doc
Architecture: source all sparc
Version: 0.12-2.2
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze <joey@debian.org>
Changed-By: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
Description:
dietlibc-dev - Lightweight C library for embedded applications
dietlibc-doc - Documentation for the diet libc library
Changes:
dietlibc (0.12-2.2) stable-security; urgency=high
.
* Non-maintainer upload by security team
* Second try actually since it turned out that there were two versions
of 0.12-2.1, since there can only be one, a new version was required
for an override.
* Backport of four security related fixes:
. Be more strict regarding hostile DNS packets
. Add integer overflow fix in xdr_array after CERT advisory
(VU#192995, CAN-2002-0391)
. Add calloc integer overflow fix after RUS-CERT advisor
. Add fread and fwrite integer overflow fix
* Fixed main Makefile to recognize ``sparc64'' as ``sparc''
* Fixed a dangling reference to a label in lib/alloc.c
* Corrected maintainer address
Files:
15d5d5021f626d40b662b37bf56892e8 581 devel optional dietlibc_0.12-2.2.dsc
572e4c0686879b6d042ca79d3aa9acd3 7815 devel optional dietlibc_0.12-2.2.diff.gz
5348058e8565523e724fa8a64b5f568c 18852 devel optional dietlibc-doc_0.12-2.2_all.deb
bc69f78304de16347a4f0d1c7de3728c 238992 devel optional dietlibc-dev_0.12-2.2_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9UXk/W5ql+IAeqTIRAtckAJ9AtXsQhTvutCeasWlGbbx40pmk/wCeMV66
z+CSBqCdKzjAn1ocZ9brNNg=
=dc08
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
dietlibc-dev_0.12-2.2_sparc.deb
to pool/main/d/dietlibc/dietlibc-dev_0.12-2.2_sparc.deb
dietlibc-doc_0.12-2.2_all.deb
to pool/main/d/dietlibc/dietlibc-doc_0.12-2.2_all.deb
dietlibc_0.12-2.2.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/dietlibc/dietlibc_0.12-2.2.diff.gz
dietlibc_0.12-2.2.dsc
to pool/main/d/dietlibc/dietlibc_0.12-2.2.dsc
Reply to: