uploading fvwm95_2.0.42a-10.1_i386.changes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.5
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 20:50:27 +0200
Source: fvwm95
Binary: fvwm95
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.42a-10.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <joost@rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl>
Description:
fvwm95 - Win95 lookalike Window Manager for X
Changes:
fvwm95 (2.0.42a-10.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* no, I'm not the maintainer, I just did the last 4 releases for fun.
This release doesn't attempt to fix all bugs, only those that are
related to menu, and bash-2.0. Still, it fixes quite a few bugs:
* added a "-f" to "-rm `find ...`" in the clean target.
* added ";"'s to for loops in Makefile.in, to keep bash-2.0 happy.
* replaced "/usr/include/X11/" by "/usr/X11/include" in default
system.fvwm2rc95-menu
* changed /etc/menu-method/fvwm95: now quotes titles in xterm arguments,
uses hotkeys, and uses "new-format" menu syntax.
* new suggests: menu
* if there was no /etc/X11/fvwm95/system.fvwm2rc95, then copy the
one found in /usr/doc/fvwm95/example/system.fvwm2rc95.gz (to make
fvwm95 usable without menu package). This is a hack, sure, but
as menu (when installed) will overwrite this file, it cannot be
a conffile.
* remove executable bits from /usr/lib/menu/fvwm95.
* compiled for libc6
* changed description (no X-windows).
Files:
432af3154ee42e0a364d64295c4918ed 636 x11 optional fvwm95_2.0.42a-10.1.dsc
dd0b30e1d57b78a4a6b285c0a3bbe922 16697 x11 optional fvwm95_2.0.42a-10.1.diff.gz
fe280f7cffa23d61756f94bb03d4d6f7 270916 x11 optional fvwm95_2.0.42a-10.1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM62GG5NVaG8BiEBRAQFtNAP+Lwh9NpNkfKqP2A/FI4Jm+aYw8ee6Tzl2
WD49goERz8bjjcdAug4UdFEQGJVMVbem7PzmI8m1N/o4QLgg5ZNgpsZwtJBpNJFU
cUpdZCWDnwGfsKdPX7akhxEVuIEddo4pNxv8KaVCAEYAfFw7G/ayDK1ZwGdj/zf6
A/8a4Ej9XwI=
=4G9I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: