[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded pkg-order 0.07 (source all) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 16:53:07 -0500
Source: pkg-order
Binary: pkg-order
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.07
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Description: 
 pkg-order  - A Package dependency checker and install ordering tool
Changes: 
 pkg-order (0.07) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * This is the first non-experimental version.
   * Rewrote pkg-order, the package ordering tool, subsuming most of the
     functionality into the libraries.  This script should be looked upon as
     a showcase for the libraries, and it is indeed just a wrapper that
     hendles command line options (through standard getopt libraries), and
     call routines from the pkg-order libraries. The script is not terribly
     efficient, choosing instead to demonstrate various aspects of the
     libraries. It should, however, fix BUG#8808.
   * All TODO's impleented, so removed TODO list
   * Separated Requirements and Class_Hierarchy from README
   * Added a new package for targets to hold reverse dependency information
   * Added routines handling Pre-Dependecy into List.pm
Files: 
 a49508a597e0f87fc62d9d5d95dc6779 601 misc optional pkg-order_0.07.dsc
 9a0847e7e5941b0a32f696b455d04ba1 34642 misc optional pkg-order_0.07.tar.gz
 e313949c7baa01378e6e69b9751bbefb 47544 misc optional pkg-order_0.07_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv
Comment: Requires PGP version 2.6 or later.

iQCVAwUBM27PZG3FgPXHJhCVAQGxTwP/d20f4Ph0DeIh6zJYRMJsjRdMO1JZhcNX
wlHUc7VKufxAnaWkZH8LyN+1rXy4K797bceaIVdtqA+vAXZ1yHA5zuwYbcD8r7Gv
jUwWe68aW1obujALCxFq32N/QlnR/7lHAECxmQmop0FRXpeTAYXrhTGdSiTZYZ51
SiVUASqsxdA=
=5DBy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: