Uploaded pgp 2.6.3a-1 (source i386) to nonus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.5
Date: Sat, 3 May 1997 21:41:18 +0300
Source: pgp
Binary: pgp-i pgp-us
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.3a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <liw@iki.fi>
Description:
pgp-i - Public key encryption system (International version)
pgp-us - Public key encryption system (US version)
Changes:
pgp (2.6.3a-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Started from scratch with upstream version 2.6.3a.
* Copied Debian packaging files from previous version.
* src/pgp.c: Added note to comment that this has been modified by me.
* src/fileio.h: Added an #ifndef around the definition of PGP_SYSTEM_DIR,
so that we can define it from the command line.
* src/language.c: Applied my patch for better handling of language.txt
and language.idx files.
* doc/pgp.1: Added two lines to BUGS section that explain that "Key
generation error" may be due to missing ~/.pgp.
* debian/readme.{1st,usa} and debian/setup.doc: Copied from distribution
(but they aren't really part of the source tree).
* debian/rules: Modified to use my new rsaref package (RSAREF source code
no longer part of PGP package.)
Files:
331bf0ec06a945cf736abd1f43a07b13 613 non-free extra pgp_2.6.3a-1.dsc
516b1c51c2a648d133b17a982675f5b8 569811 non-free extra pgp_2.6.3a.orig.tar.gz
b7ca352d8e9d066049892300efcef25b 22180 non-free extra pgp_2.6.3a-1.diff.gz
b8bb34127dfb5ff80405a7e180f8539d 277198 non-free extra pgp-i_2.6.3a-1_i386.deb
e5702eeec5b824a7a0fb73f6e8d75d52 275368 non-free extra pgp-us_2.6.3a-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM2uW04QRll5MupLRAQF3/wP9FryAQQnLes2tBlWBgV30KRJqI0+X3jws
JvLqucpljRqBBhb+NL+Pl3fhX3RfFQF5bT8jXqf9xKRLmTP4DXmOF0zTqCxiaqq4
/Y/07bKIfNrnFd8dLAjVPk/iKuZ0PfWukp9pKWetqgs7ewiGP7LbYmHxWt7mtTu7
o02e79Dk0Yg=
=Ba8W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: