man-db 2.3.10-33 uploaded to master
Hi folks,
with thw last two debian versions this package has doubled its size,
due to the manual that I added and that wasn't in the upstream version
(this explains the size of the diff :-)
I think there is a strong need for Ian's extension of dpkg to do
partial installation of a binary package.
In the meanwhile, if people ask for this, I could split the package
seperating the docs from the binaries.
Cheers,
Fabrizio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.5
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 17:47:13 +0200
Source: man-db
Binary: man-db
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3.10-33
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fabrizio Polacco <fpolacco@debian.org>
Description:
man-db - Display the on-line manual.
Changes:
man-db (2.3.10-33) unstable; urgency=low
.
* This will replace man package in Debian 1.3
* Corrected typo in control file
* Added dwww index entry
* Added html version of manual (from .me via unroff + manual edit :-( )
* Moved dependency on bsdmainutils from Depends to Suggests.
* Removed failure of installation if removal of catpages failed.
* Added italian manpages and message catalogs
(Thanx to Giovanni Bortolozzo <borto@dei.unipd.it>)
Files:
8d081346fb7fe545386f48b22aae3d10 627 doc important man-db_2.3.10-33.dsc
0f87b91625f88c49e3e3a7826ebdda54 82369 doc important man-db_2.3.10-33.diff.gz
cc76a8eef1b24a1215e3a75a98805243 215004 doc important man-db_2.3.10-33_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBMyFlLX2120Nvcmf1AQGdBAQAneNFSzp7oTTGSjOXkgjTZfB4OAuMPP2V
I0niqhXvjYecio4eGU7ZvedvX4F5tPVKS/p2ufJ4D9tWxbJoaLxtWt/ZIQkj5k6A
+rfTwCEeuWFA9NGau9Ui/e121d0mPVM3ysiEbTsTb9vKoEJ2d7yYlPvBJgeRxxUD
LFsXhPzK1y0=
=oajo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| fpolacco@icenet.fi fpolacco@debian.org - Using Debian GNU/Linux ! |
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E |
> Dog meat? Don't worry, Gwendolen, I'm on my way! [Wallace] |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: