Bug#986209: debian-cd: Please provide symlinks for stable, unstable, etc...
UNSUBSCRIBE
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 31, 2021, at 12:18 PM, bauen1 <j2468h@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Package: debian-cd
> Version: 3.1.33
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: j2468h@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> While building my own CDs I've discovered that while most tools, e.g. debootstrap, allow using `unstable` / `sid` with the same results, debian-cd does not.
> This could be handled by adding symlinks, like for sid, to data, tasks, tools/boot , thus allowing the user to specify CODENAME=unstable to build a sid installer cd.
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: bullseye/sid
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
> Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> LSM: SELinux: enabled - Mode: Enforcing - Policy name: bauen1-policy
>
> Versions of packages debian-cd depends on:
> ii apt 2.2.2
> ii bc 1.07.1-2+b2
> ii bzip2 1.0.8-4
> ii cpp 4:10.2.1-1
> ii curl 7.74.0-1.1
> ii dctrl-tools [grep-dctrl] 2.24-3+b1
> ii dpkg-dev 1.20.7.1
> ii genisoimage 9:1.1.11-3.2
> pn libcompress-zlib-perl <none>
> pn libdigest-md5-perl <none>
> ii libdpkg-perl 1.20.7.1
> ii lynx 2.9.0dev.6-2
> ii make 4.3-4
> ii perl [libdigest-sha-perl] 5.32.1-3
> ii tofrodos 1.7.13+ds-5
> ii wget 1.21-1+b1
> ii xorriso 1.5.2-1
>
> Versions of packages debian-cd recommends:
> ii dosfstools 4.2-1
> ii hfsutils 3.2.6-15
> ii isolinux 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3
> ii mtools 4.0.26-1
> ii netpbm 2:10.0-15.4
> ii syslinux-common 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3
> ii syslinux-utils 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3
>
> debian-cd suggests no packages.
>
> -- no debconf information
>
Reply to: