On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 10:53 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 1/22/2019 7:08 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Alternatively, we could make pigz a strict build requirement but > > > that sounds a little antisocial. > > Right. > In what way do you consider this antisocial and what's speaking > against > doing that? If it's about CPU time, then maybe it should obey the > parallelization setting of the build process. [...] The general way to communicate this is by wrapping the build in "taskset", and pigz will surely follow that. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat. - John Lehman
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part