Bug#878178: marked as done (cdimage.debian.org: Debian 9.2.0 and 9.2.0-live images built with base-files 9.9+deb9u1)
Your message dated Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:58:56 +0100
with message-id <20171010195856.lsx3y2f5gu7dkobl@tack.einval.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#878178: cdimage.debian.org: Debian 9.2.0 and 9.2.0-live images built with base-files 9.9+deb9u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #878178,
regarding cdimage.debian.org: Debian 9.2.0 and 9.2.0-live images built with base-files 9.9+deb9u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
878178: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878178
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cdimage.debian.org
Severity: normal
Debian CD-ROM [sic] Team,
All Debian 9.2.0 and 9.2.0-live images appear to have been built with
base-files 9.9+deb9u1 instead of 9.9+deb9u2.
I'll guess that this was due to 9.9+deb9u2 being accepted
into proposed-updates on Oct 7, 2017.
Thank you!
Dan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 02:23:52PM -0500, Daniel Lewart wrote:
>Package: cdimage.debian.org
>Severity: normal
>
>Debian CD-ROM [sic] Team,
>
>All Debian 9.2.0 and 9.2.0-live images appear to have been built with
>base-files 9.9+deb9u1 instead of 9.9+deb9u2.
>
>I'll guess that this was due to 9.9+deb9u2 being accepted
>into proposed-updates on Oct 7, 2017.
Correct - the base-files update didn't make it in before the 9.2 point
release. The releas team decided to press on rather than re-spin the
release. The installation and live media builds reflect that.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
< Aardvark> I dislike C++ to start with. C++11 just seems to be
handing rope-creating factories for users to hang multiple
instances of themselves.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: