[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#858805: cdimage.debian.org: File on DVD images failed the MD5 checksum verification



"J. L. Lee" <jllee@jllee.per.sg> writes:

> Hi Phil,
>
> Thanks for your guidance on what you wanted me to do. Following are the 
> checksums of 2 iso images I still keep.
>
> ~$ md5sum debian-testing-i386-DVD-1 (image of the iso image downloaded 
> on 27 Feb.)
> c4532760456548a75e58edb4c6338d78  debian-testing-i386-DVD-1
>
> ~$ md5sum debian-testing-i386-DVD-1.iso (image of the iso image 
> downloaded 24 March)
> e1f666377199fcfd1a98f0ce67b1fcad  debian-testing-i386-DVD-1.iso
> jllee@debianamd64:~$
>
> ~$ md5sum 
> /media/usb/pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-extra-utils_2016.20170123-5_all.deb 
> (on i386 USB stick)
> 1a66b41cabb6cd0a987394838267923a 
> /media/usb/pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-extra-utils_2016.20170123-5_all.deb
>
> ~$ md5sum 
> /media/usb/pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-extra-utils_2016.20170123-5_all.deb 
> (on amd64 USB stick)
> 1a66b41cabb6cd0a987394838267923a 
> /media/usb/pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-extra-utils_2016.20170123-5_all.deb

Looking at that file on my mirror, I see:

phil@free:/org/ftp/debian$ md5sum pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-extra-utils_2016.20170123-5_all.deb
1a66b41cabb6cd0a987394838267923a  pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-extra-utils_2016.20170123-5_all.deb

phil@free:/org/ftp/debian$ zgrep texlive-extra-utils_2016.20170123-5_all.deb indices/md5sums.gz 
1a66b41cabb6cd0a987394838267923a  pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-extra-utils_2016.20170123-5_all.deb

so the md5sum you're getting would seem to be right -- what makes you
think it is wrong?

BTW I also note that the md5sums.txt file in top level of a DVD image I
just jigdo-ed contains the same checksum for that file.

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
|)|  Philip Hands  [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]  HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-|  http://www.hands.com/    http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(|  Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34,   21075 Hamburg,    GERMANY

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: