On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 21:43 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ben Hutchings <firstname.lastname@example.org> (2016-05-22): > > > > All the binary packages built from firmware-nonfree get it > > automatically, but I forgot there were so many other firmware packages. > > Maybe your way is better for now. > ACK. Easy enough to toggle between both anyway. Maybe I should even > keep both codepaths active and use them to detect inconsistencies > between file list in Contents and Appstream metadata in Components… > > > > > > > > > amd64-microcode > > > atmel-firmware > > > bluez-firmware > > > dahdi-firmware-nonfree > > > firmware-crystalhd > > > firmware-ipw2x00 > > firmware-ipw2x00 does have it. > Alright. I ran diff plus some pipes, without checking each and every > package, which explains this kind of false positive. > > It seems the following files are under lib/firmware but not listed in > Appstream metadata: > lib/firmware/ipw2x00.LICENSE > lib/firmware/isci/isci_firmware.bin > > Not sure about the former It's a symlink to the licence text, presumably because Bastian read the distributor licence as requiring we put it in the same directory as the firmware. > but I suppose the latter should be listed there? [...] The latter is in firmware-linux-free, which as I said doesn't generate DEP-11 metadata. I'll fix that in the next upload. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings friends: People who know you well, but like you anyway.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part