On 25/08/14 04:55, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > * Architecture support: my own, limited testing made me discover how > badly broken d-i on GNU/kFreeBSD was, and I shared my concerns some > days ago with BSD people and the release team. I haven't seen anyone > commit to fixing d-i there and making sure it's kept in a good shape. > [ To be determined, needs release team input at least. ] But I provided patches already for all the important issues you mentioned: #757985, #757987, #757988 and at least replied about the other, to say that it's not a blocker for jessie release: #757986 In case you still need me to say it explicitly, I am committed to testing for and fixing kfreebsd d-i issues between now and release. I'll be trying to automate some of this too (initially my own thing, hopefully leading to jenkins.d.n integration someday). I admit I was not doing full test installs since the d-i alpha (though I was doing daily builds of it as part of the kfreebsd 10.1 kernel packaging work). I still thought it was early days to worry about d-i, and didn't know the Beta 1 was coming. I watched Steve's talk and I do understand the need for this to happen now. Thank you, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain steven@pyro.eu.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature