[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#547418: marked as done (Lenny files on cdimage.d.o: consistency of naming scheme, matching the release version)

Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:11:33 +0100
with message-id <20101115201133.GA14458@glenfiddich.ikibiki.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#547418: Dropping the .0 on release numbers?
has caused the Debian Bug report #547418,
regarding Lenny files on cdimage.d.o: consistency of naming scheme, matching the release version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

547418: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547418
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cdimage.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

(I don't really know which is the best package to report on between
cdimage.d.o, debian-cd, cdrom. Pseudo-packages description doesn't help
that much).

While update CD/DVD are named debian-update-5.0.3-$ARCH.something, other
images are named debian-update-503-$ARCH.something.

The later naming scheme may confuse people, who might think it is version
503 while it will be released only within 500 years.
And moreover, it is not consistent with the naming of update CD, an
other opportunity to confuse people.

So unless there is a good reason to remove full stops from only some
filenames, please consider naming images
debian-5.0.3-$ARCH-something.iso so that it match the release version.

Best regards.

Simon Paillard

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.1.4

> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:23:27PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > But yes, I agree - I'm happy to rename the CDs to include the dots in
> > the version number.  AFAIK the only reason not to do that previously
> > was a scare story about broken filename handling in old versions of
> > Windows. Not something I care about any more...
> > 
> > Code change is in debian-cd svn as of ~2 minutes ago...

Fixed in debian-cd 3.1.4:

r2051 | 93sam | 2010-09-14 22:23:12 +0200 (mar. 14 sept. 2010)
  * On release builds, use the full version number including all the dots
    (e.g. 6.0.0 for the squeeze release instead of 600).

Thanks !

Simon Paillard

--- End Message ---

Reply to: