On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >How about just removing the directory for bittorent and any links to it > > for oldstable? If we cannot seed the images and they unlikely to get > > seeded much by others, should we really offer bittorent at all? > > > >Wouldn't it be better to just offer jigdo and the ISOs and be done with > > it? > > Yup, I guess so. We should be able to handle the ISO/jigdo downloads > directly from cdimage; bittorent is just adding overhead if there > aren't a lot of users. Maswan - you may as well kill the bt stuff. OK. I'll remove the links from http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/ Who will remove the relevant directories from the mirrors: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/3.1_r7/*/bt-*/ ? (And probably also for older oldstable releases?)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.