[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#336173: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)



Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:38:57 +0100
with message-id <200510311038.58866.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line AMD64: Install failures with businesscard and netinst CDs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2005 10:31:18 +0000
>From matt.nottingham@zen.co.uk Fri Oct 28 03:31:18 2005
Return-path: <matt.nottingham@zen.co.uk>
Received: from pythagoras.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.140] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EVRW2-0004l2-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:31:18 -0700
Received: from [217.155.229.5] (helo=trinity.bms.co.uk)
	by pythagoras.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1EVRW0-0001sN-JW; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:31:16 +0000
Received: from matt by trinity.bms.co.uk with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EVRW0-0001Hi-CY; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:31:16 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <17249.65012.349869.997248@trinity.bms.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:31:16 +0100
From: matt.nottingham@zen.co.uk
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
cc: matt.nottingham@zen.co.uk 
Subject: Package: installation-reports
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: matt.nottingham@zen.co.uk
X-Originating-Pythagoras-IP: [217.155.229.5]
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 28/10/2005
uname -a: 2.6.9.12-1-amd64-generic #1 Wed sept 28 02:05:15 2005 x86_64
unknown
Date: 11:00m BST 28/10/2005
Method: Network install from CDROM 

Machine: ASUS A8N-SLI Delux
Processor: AMD64 S939 3800+
Memory: 4gigs
Root Device: SATA
Root Size/partition table: 

2 200GB disks with parts:

190GB
10GB
3.9GB

the 190GB parts are combined as raid1 with ext3 mounted as /
the 2 10GB parts are configured as ext3 and mounted as /local &
/local1
The 2 3.9GB parts are used as swap.

Output of lspci and lspci -n:

Don't have access to lspci in busybox

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [E]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]

Comments/Problems:

When tying to install the base_files package it says (in virt con 3)
"chroot: cannot execute mount: No such file or directory".

If I do a df, it shows /dev/md/0 mounted as /target and
/dev/cdroms/cdrom0 mounted as /cdrom.

I also had this exact same problem which an image I downloaded on
25/10/05

Hope this helps.

Thanks.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 335653-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2005 09:38:58 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Mon Oct 31 01:38:58 2005
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from smtp-out2.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.177] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EWW82-0000x4-00; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 01:38:58 -0800
Received: from [195.240.184.66] (helo=strider.fjphome.nl)
	by smtp-out2.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
	id 1EWW81-0004fp-VH; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:38:58 +0100
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: 335653-done@bugs.debian.org,
 336451-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: AMD64: Install failures with businesscard and netinst CDs
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:38:57 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <20051025075512.GC12031@greyweasel.com> <20051026072053.GE12031@greyweasel.com> <200510262126.06190.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
In-Reply-To: <200510262126.06190.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510311038.58866.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 335653-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

> The package mount is completely missing... Reassigning to debian-cd.

> Turns out that the AMD64 businesscard CD images incorrectly contains the 
> file .disk/base_installable, which of course is wrong. This makes the 
> installer incorrectly think it can install the base system off the CD.

These issues have now been fixed. Thank you very much for your help in 
tracking it down.

Feel free to file a new installation report after you try again; see 
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstallerToday for remaining issues.

Cheers,
FJP



Reply to: