On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 05:38:00PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> 1. Did we ever agree on a directory structure to cope with CDs and
>> DVDs together? I'm thinking for now I'll just set up a parallel
>> $ARCH-dvd directory alongside the $ARCH directory for the CDs.
>
>Hmm, I don't know which system is best, but on cdimage, we have cd/$ARCH
>and dvd/$ARCH, so just in terms of consistency, that might be a better
>option.
True. The problem is that I'll have to move the existing CD jigdo bits
too. I'm bothered that that may break mirroring etc. I suppose I could
move the existing directories into cd/ and put sym-links in place:
jigdo/
current -> 3.0r3
3.0r3/
alpha/
arm/
...
to
jigdo/
current -> 3.0r3
3.0r3/
cd/
alpha/
arm/
...
dvd
alpha/
arm/
...
alpha -> cd/alpha
arm -> cd/arm
...
>> 2. As these will chew up a _lot_ of space, I'm assuming nobody will
>> want to host full ISOs...?
>
>IIRC the consensus was that for sarge, full DVD images would be available
>on cdimage for i386 only. We could do the same for woody r3, though - what
>do you think, Mattias?
The fun bit is that we have 1 and 1_NONUS versions of all the woody
DVDs too... :-/
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
"...In the UNIX world, people tend to interpret `non-technical user'
as meaning someone who's only ever written one device driver." -- Daniel Pead
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature