On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 08:30, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:35:01AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen écrivait: > > I believe it is better to have bad options documented as such, instead > > of leaving it to the users to find, test and discover the features of > > undocumented options. > > I believe it is better to not confuse the user with multiple solutions to > handle multiboot when one is clearly better than the other one... It's probably worth documenting the fact that Multiboot is not as good as ISOLINUX, with a quick description of why, so that people don't waste time testing it at some point in the future, on the mistaken assumption that they thought of it first. Cheers, Phil. -- Say no to software patents! http://petition.eurolinux.org/ |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part