[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Documenting the MULTIBOOT option

On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 08:30, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:35:01AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen écrivait:
> > I believe it is better to have bad options documented as such, instead
> > of leaving it to the users to find, test and discover the features of
> > undocumented options.
> I believe it is better to not confuse the user with multiple solutions to
> handle multiboot when one is clearly better than the other one...

It's probably worth documenting the fact that Multiboot is not as good
as ISOLINUX, with a quick description of why, so that people don't waste
time testing it at some point in the future, on the mistaken assumption
that they thought of it first.

Cheers, Phil.
Say no to software patents!  http://petition.eurolinux.org/

|)|  Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]    http://www.hands.com/
|-|  HANDS.COM Ltd.                    http://www.uk.debian.org/
|(|  10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London  E18 1NE  ENGLAND

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: