Re: 2.2rev3 CDs (was Re: Stable Release plan)
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Bernd Hentig wrote:
> AFAIK, the only kernels worth having in either binary or source
> are (in release order) 2.0.36, 2.0.17, 2.0.19, 2.4.2. All others are
> either junk and pretty unstable or useless (at least IMHO).
> So, I've never really seen any use in having ancient sources in
> the *distribution* cds and I fear things will become worse with
> woody (5 CDs binary installation ?).
You don't like *any* of the 2.2 series?
What have you found to be the problems with them? I run them on a
number of production machines at work and at home (mostly 2.2.19 now,
but some older).
--
Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
Reply to: