Re: Updates of the cdimage.d.o webpages
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> i just looked at cdimage.d.o about the _CDa images if there is a
> statement on this but couldn't find any. it just says that
> 2.2_rev0 are the official ones, so the _CDa aren't (if a new user
> reads that). afaik is _CDa also an official image. maybe one
> should update the pages on these kind of images and also give a
> short explanation why there is _CDa.
The _rev0 are (read "have been") just as official as the _CDa versions. But
you're right of course; I've updated the webpage.
Regards,
Anne Bezemer
Reply to: