Re: Two more corrupt .debs found from 2.2_rev0 images

[jason andrade <jason@dstc.edu.au>]

On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:

> Maybe you should take another look ;-)  c.d.o does have 
> 2.2_rev0_CDa and that's where I got them yesterday. Since they 
> were available, I thought it was appropriate to get them.

doh - sorry - must have missed spotting it when i looked, because
i thought *all* of the tree would be moved into 2.2_rev0_CDa.

uhm.. a bit annoying now because there are 2 "2.2" trees and of
course other symlinks i have e.g

lrwxrwxrwx   1 mirror   mirror         8 Aug 15 07:30 current -> 2.2_rev0
lrwxrwxrwx   1 mirror   mirror         8 Aug 15 07:30 potato -> 2.2_rev0

are of course technically unusable now.

anyhow - i'm updating our sparc images now too.

regards,

-jason