[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [sanvila@unex.es: Bug#68477: apt-cdrom confused by symlinks.]



On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Raphael Hertzog wrote:

> Hello, 
> 
> i'd like to have some input about this bug report. Should I do that or
> should I reassign the bug to apt because it chooses unstable before stable
> when all 3 links are available ?
> 
> Keep in mind that I want to be able to generate CDs for stable, frozen and
> unstable.

IMHO, the right thing to do here would be to use "stable" if the CD is
for stable, "frozen" if the CD is for frozen, and "unstable" if the CD
is for unstable.

For a given architecture, at a given time, any given distribution
(potato, woody, etc.) is either stable, frozen or unstable, but never
two or three different things among stable, frozen and unstable.

Of course, for a test CD which is intended to be a "prototype for stable CD",
using "stable" would be the logical choice.



Reply to: