Re: Bug in FAQ?
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> nice -19 cdrecord <etcetc>
>> as example for cdrecord usage. That's giving the task a *positive* nicety
>> instead of a negative one. The cdrecord manpage recommends "nice --18"
>Doesn't cdrecord turn itself into a SCHED_FIFO process anyhow (if not,
Looking through the manpage again, it uses the "nice --18" for *mkisofs*
(when piping the mkisofs output directly to cdrecord). cdrecord *does* set
its priority properly.
Ashes on my head.
Drive A: not responding...Formatting C: instead