[bts-link] source package ssmtp
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package ssmtp
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
# remote status report for #448037 (http://bugs.debian.org/448037)
# Bug title: Patch: enabling the use of ":" for smtp authentications.
# * https://github.com/Project-OSS-Revival/ssmtp/issues/3
# * remote status changed: (?) -> closed
# * closed upstream
tags 448037 + fixed-upstream
usertags 448037 + status-closed
# remote status report for #623856 (http://bugs.debian.org/623856)
# Bug title: String overscan issues in ssmtp (potential for memory corruption)
# * https://github.com/Project-OSS-Revival/ssmtp/issues/10
# * remote status changed: (?) -> open
usertags 623856 + status-open
# remote status report for #662958 (http://bugs.debian.org/662958)
# Bug title: ssmtp doesn't support separate client key/certificate files
# * https://github.com/Project-OSS-Revival/ssmtp/issues/4
# * remote status changed: (?) -> closed
# * closed upstream
tags 662958 + fixed-upstream
usertags 662958 + status-closed
# remote status report for #662960 (http://bugs.debian.org/662960)
# Bug title: ssmtp doesn't validate server TLS certificates
# * https://github.com/Project-OSS-Revival/ssmtp/issues/4
# * remote status changed: (?) -> closed
# * closed upstream
tags 662960 + fixed-upstream
usertags 662960 + status-closed
# remote status report for #1004116 (http://bugs.debian.org/1004116)
# Bug title: ssmtp: ssmtp truncates headers longer than BUF_SZ
# * https://github.com/Project-OSS-Revival/ssmtp/issues/11
# * remote status changed: (?) -> open
usertags 1004116 + status-open
# remote status report for #1029067 (http://bugs.debian.org/1029067)
# Bug title: ssmtp sends parts of its own config file on invalid inputs
# * https://github.com/Project-OSS-Revival/ssmtp/issues/5
# * remote status changed: (?) -> closed
# * closed upstream
tags 1029067 + fixed-upstream
usertags 1029067 + status-closed
thanks
Reply to: