[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package glib2.0



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package glib2.0
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #     https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #773915 (http://bugs.debian.org/773915)
> # Bug title: 'Run in terminal' should use the preferred terminal
> #  * https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/338
> #  * remote status changed: opened -> closed
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 773915 + fixed-upstream
Bug #773915 [libglib2.0-0] 'Run in terminal' should use the preferred terminal
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 773915 - status-opened
Usertags were: status-opened.
There are now no usertags set.
> usertags 773915 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> # remote status report for #1003206 (http://bugs.debian.org/1003206)
> # Bug title: libglib2.0-0: the terminal for desktop files with Terminal=true should be configurable
> #  * https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/338
> #  * remote status changed: opened -> closed
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 1003206 + fixed-upstream
Bug #1003206 [libglib2.0-0] libglib2.0-0: the terminal for desktop files with Terminal=true should be configurable
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 1003206 - status-opened
Usertags were: status-opened.
There are now no usertags set.
> usertags 1003206 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1003206: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003206
773915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: