Processed: [bts-link] source package emacs
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package emacs
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #935321 (http://bugs.debian.org/935321)
> # Bug title: emacs-common: In CPerl mode, text in comment should not be highlighted as in normal code
> # * https://debbugs.gnu.org/3091
> # * remote status changed: fixed -> done
> # * closed upstream
> tags 935321 + fixed-upstream
Bug #935321 [emacs-common] emacs-common: In CPerl mode, text in comment should not be highlighted as in normal code
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 935321 - status-fixed
Usertags were: resolution-fixed status-fixed.
Usertags are now: resolution-fixed.
> usertags 935321 + status-done
Usertags were: resolution-fixed.
Usertags are now: resolution-fixed status-done.
> # remote status report for #935420 (http://bugs.debian.org/935420)
> # Bug title: emacs-common: in CPerl mode, Emacs hangs when editing a regexp with "(?"
> # * https://debbugs.gnu.org/16368
> # * remote status changed: pending -> done
> # * closed upstream
> tags 935420 + fixed-upstream
Bug #935420 [emacs-common] emacs-common: in CPerl mode, Emacs hangs when editing a regexp with "(?"
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 935420 - status-pending
Usertags were: status-pending resolution-patch-confirmed.
Usertags are now: resolution-patch-confirmed.
> usertags 935420 + status-done
Usertags were: resolution-patch-confirmed.
Usertags are now: status-done resolution-patch-confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
935321: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935321
935420: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935420
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Reply to: