[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package akregator



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package akregator
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #     https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #590147 (http://bugs.debian.org/590147)
> # Bug title: akregator crashes at start
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116482
> #  * remote status changed: REOPENED -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 590147 + fixed-upstream
Bug #590147 [akregator] akregator crashes at start
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 590147 - status-REOPENED
Usertags were: status-REOPENED.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 590147 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #691995 (http://bugs.debian.org/691995)
> # Bug title: akregator: Crash while refreshing feeds
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116482
> #  * remote status changed: REOPENED -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 691995 + fixed-upstream
Bug #691995 [akregator] akregator: Crash while refreshing feeds
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 691995 - status-REOPENED
Usertags were: status-REOPENED.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 691995 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
590147: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590147
691995: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691995
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: